Emily Menendez

GU Oncology Now

Fragmented care (FC) occurs when patients with cancer receive care from multiple institutions, which can affect oncologic outcomes. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S107814392200432X" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Riveros et al</a> sought to determine if care fragmentation impacts the outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Treatment outcomes were compared between patients who received FC and those who received non-fragmented care (NFC).The researchers used results from the National Cancer Database that featured adult patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who had received NAC followed by RC between 2004 and 2017. The patient groups were divided into 2 arms: FC (defined as receiving NAC at a different facility from where RC was performed) or NFC (defined as receiving NAC and RC at a single facility).The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included time from diagnosis to treatment (NAC and RC) and perioperative outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between FC and OS in the context of other relevant covariates, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated after stratifying by type of care received.The study enrolled a total of 2223 patients. Of those patients, 1035 (46.6%) had received FC and 1188 (53.4%) had received NFC. Patients with FC experienced a greater travel distance, higher comorbidity burden, and more often had their surgical treatment carried out at high-volume facilities. They also experienced a slightly longer median time to RC (160 vs 154 days, P=.001).On Kaplan-Meier analysis, no differences in median OS were found between the FC and NFC groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed the factors associated with worse OS included age, advanced tumor, node, metastasis stage, lymphovascular invasion, and positive surgical margins. However, FC was not associated with worse OS. On subgroup analysis, the researchers found that FC received at academic facilities and NFC received at high-volume centers were associated with lower rates of overall mortality.The researchers concluded that FC is not associated with worse outcomes for patients with MIBC who receive NAC followed by RC. Both FC and NFC are seen as reliable treatment options for patients.

Does Fragmented Care Result in Worse Outcomes for Patients With Bladder Cancer?

Muscle Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

Researchers sought to determine if care fragmentation impacts the outcomes of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for MIBC.

Does Fragmented Care Result in Worse Outcomes?

About Us

Contributors and Partners

Editorial Policy

Advertising

eNewsletters

Calendar

Contact Us

Contribute

MashupMD

Cancer Nursing Today

Urban Health Today

Blood Cancers Today

DocWire News

Knowledge Hubs

Conference Coverage

Roundtables

The Uromigos

Uromigos Live 2024

AUC3

Localized

mHSPC/mCSPC

CRPC

Diagnostics

Prostate Cancer

Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma

Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

nccRCC

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Non-Muscle Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Urothelial Carcinoma

Testicular, Penile, and Rare Cancers

Video Insights

Advancements in Oncology

The Oncology Brothers

Expert Interviews

Journal

Subscribe